Opportunistic feeding experiment in a captive franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei): assessing gastrointestinal transit time and gastric digestion.
Keywords:franciscana, stomach contents, digestion rate, captive animal
The data consists of spreadsheets containing (i) otolith and cephalopod beak numbers and sizes, and the time of recovery for seven different prey species of different meals; (ii) conditions of prey structures for each meal and its time of recovery; and (iii) the times that the plastic colour markers were ingested and evacuated from a feeding experiment with a franciscana dolphin in captivity.
Arim, M. and Naya, D. E. (2003) Pinniped diets inferred from scats: analysis of biases in prey occurrence. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81(1): 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-221
Barros, N. and Clarke, M. R. (2009) Diet. In Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals (Second Edition), pp. 311-316.
Bassoi, M. (1997) Avaliação alimentar de toninhas, Pontoporia blainvillei (Gervais and D'Orbigny, 1844), capturadas acidentalmente na pesca costeira de emalhe, no sul do Rio Grande do Sul. BSc Dissertation, Universidade do Rio Grande, Rio Grande. 68pp.
Bassoi, M (2005) Feeding ecology of franciscana dolphin, Pontoporia blainvillei (Cetacea:Pontoporiidae), and oceanographic processes on the Southern Brazilian coast. University of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering Science and Mathematics, School of Ocean and Earth Science, Doctoral Thesis, 208pp.
Bigg, M. A. and Fawcett, I. (1985) Two biases in diet determination of northern fur seals. Pages 284-291 in Beddington, J. R., Beverton, R. J. H., and Lavigne, D. M. (Eds) Marine mammals and fisheries. George Allen & Unwin, London.
Clarke, M. R. (Ed) (1986a) A handbook for the identification of cephalopod beaks. Page 273, Claredon Press, Oxford.
Clarke, M. R. (1986b) Cephalopods in the diet of odontocetes. Pages 281-321 in Bryden, M. M. and Harrison, R. (Eds) Research on Dolphins. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cortes, E. (1997) A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: application to elasmobranch fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (54): 726-738. https://doi.org/10.1139/f96-316
da Silva , J. and Neilson, J. D. (1985) Limitations of using otoliths recovered in scats to estimate prey consumption in seals. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (42): 1439-1442.
Eastman, J. T. and Coalson, R. E. (1974) The digestive system of the Weddell seal Leptonychotes weddelli – a review. Pages (2): 253-320 in Harrison, R. J. (Ed) Functional anatomy of marine mammals. Academic Press, London.
Fitch, J. E. and Brownell, R. L. Jr. (1968) Fish otoliths in cetacean stomachs and the importance in interpreting feeding habitats. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 25 (12): 2561-2574. Published on the web 2011: https://doi.org/10.1139/f68-227.
Frost, K. J. and Lowry, L. F. (1980) Feeding of ribbon seals (Phoca fasciata) in the Bering Sea in spring. Canadian Journal of Zoology 58:1601-1607.
Grellier, K. and Hammond, P. S. (2006) Feeding method affects otolith digestion in captive gray seals: implications for diet composition estimation. Marine Mammal Science 21(2): 296-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2005.tb01229.x
Harvey, J. T. (1989) Assessment of errors associated with harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) faecal sampling. Journal of Zoology (London) (219): 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1989.tb02569.x
Hawes, S. D. (1983). An evaluation of California sea lion scat samples as indicators of prey importance (Doctoral dissertation, San Francisco State University).
Helm, R. C. and Morejohn, G. V. (1979). Initial defecation time and intestinal length of three species of pinnipeds: Phoca vitulina, Zalophus californianus and Mirounga angustirostris. Page 27 in Abstracts, III Biennial Conference of the Biology of Marine Mammals, Seattle, USA.
Helm, R. C. (1984). Rate of digestion in three species of pinnipeds. Canadian Journal of Zoology (62): 1751-1756.
Jobling, M. and Breiby, A. (1986) The use and abuse of fish otoliths in studies of feeding habits of marine piscivores. Sarsia (71): 265-274.
Jobling, M. (1987) Marine mammal faeces sample as indicators of prey importance: a source of errors in bioenergetics models. Sarsia (71): 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00364827.1987.10419722
Kastelein, R. A., McBain J. and Neurohr B. (1993) Information on the biology of Commerson's dolphins (Cephalorhynchus commersonii). Aquatic Mammals 19(1): 13-19.
Krockenberger, M. B., and Bryden, M. M. (1994) Rate of passage of digesta through the alimentary tract of southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) (Carnivora:Phocidae). Journal of Zoology (London) (234): 229-237.
Maronna, R. A., Martin, R. D., Yohai, V. J. and Salibián-Barrera, M. (2018) Robust Statistics: Theory and Methods (with R). Wiley.
McMahon, T. E. and Tash, J. C. (1979) Effects of formalin (buffered and unbuffered) and hidrochloric acid on fish otoliths. Copeia (1): 155-156.
Murie, D. J. (1987) Experimental approaches to stomach content analyses of piscivorous marine mammals. Pages 147-163 in Huntley, A. C., Costa, D. P., Worthy, G. A. J., and Castellini, M. A. (Eds) Approaches to marine mammals energetics. Society for Marine Mammology.
Murie, D. J. and Lavigne, D. M. (1986) Interpretation of otoliths in stomach content analyses of phocid seals: quantifying fish consumption. Canadian Journal of Zoology (64): 1152-1157. https://doi.org/10.1139/z86-174
Pierce, G. J. and Boyle, P. R. (1991) A review of methods for diet analysis in piscivororus marine mammals. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review (29): 409-486.
Pierce, G. J., Boyle, P. R., Watt, J. and Grisley, M. (1993) Recent advances in diet analysis of marine mammals. Symposium on Zoological Society of London (66): 241-261.
Pinedo, M. C. (1982) Análise dos conteúdos estomacais de Pontoporia blainvillei (Gervais e D’Orbigny, 1844) e Tursiops gephyreus (Lahille, 1908) (Cetacea, Platanistidae e Delphinidae) na zona estuarial e costeira de Rio Grande, RS, Brasil. MSc Thesis. Universidade do Rio Grande, Rio Grande. 95pp.
Pitcher, K. W. (1981) Stomach contents and faeces as indicators of Harbour seals, Phoca vitulina, foods in the Gulf of Alaska. Fishery Bulletin (78): 797-798.
Prime, J. H. (1979) Observations on the digestion of some gadoid fish otoliths by a young common seal. Marine Mammal Committee. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea CM 1979/N:14.
Prime, J. H. and Hammond, P. S. (1987) Quantitative assessment of grey diet from faecal analysis. Pages 161-181 in Huntley, A. C., Costa, D. P., Worthy, G. A. J., and Castellini, M. A. Lawrence (Eds) Approaches to marine mammals energetics. Kans Allen Press, USA.
Pusineri, C., Meunier, L., Spitz, J. and Ridoux, V. (2003) Differential digestion rates of dolphin prey: observational and experimental bases for an improved dietary analysis procedure. Page 194 in Abstracts, XVII Conference of the European Conservation Society. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
R Development Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Ross, S. D., Andreasen, H. and Andersen, N. G. (2016) An important step towards accurate estimation of diet composition and consumption rates for the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena). Marine Mammal Science 32(4): 1491–1500. https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12318
Rousseeuw, P. J. and Leroy, A. M. (2005) Robust regression and outlier detection (Vol. 589). John Wiley & Sons.
Santos, M.B., Clarke, M.R. and Pierce, G.J. (2001) Assessing the importance of cephalopods in the diets of marine mammals and other top predators: problems and solutions. Fisheries Research 52, 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00236-3
Sekiguchi, K. and Best, P. B. (1997) In vitro digestibility of some prey species of dolphins. Fishery Bulletin (95) 386-393.
Staniland, I. J. (2002) Investigating the biases in the use of hard prey remains to identify diet composition using Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) in captive feeding trials. Marine Mammal Science 18(1): 223-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2002.tb01030.x
Tollit, D. J., Steward, M. J., Thompson, P. M., Pierce, G. J., Santos, M. B. and Hughes, S. (1997) Species and size differences in the digestion of otoliths and beaks: implications for estimates of pinniped diet composition. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (54): 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1139/f96-264
Treacy, S. D. (1981) Retrieval of otoliths and statoliths from gastrointestinal contents and scats of marine mammals. Journal of Wildlife Management 45(4): 990-993. https://doi.org/10.2307/3808110
Waldemarin, H. F. and Colares, E. P. (1994) Tempo de passagem de alimento pelo trato digestivo de Otaria flavescens jovem e adulto em cativeiro. Page 41 in Abstracts, VI Reunião de Especialistas em Mamíferos Aquáticos da América do Sul. Florianópolis, Brazil.
Walker, W. A., Leatherwood, S., Goodrich, K. R., Perrin, W. F. and Stroud, R. K. (1986) Geographical variation and biology of the Pacific white-sided dolphin, Lagenorhynchus obliquidens, in the northeastern Pacific. Pages 441-465 in Bryden, M. M. and Harrison, R. (Eds) Research on Dolphins. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Wijnsma, G., Pierce, G.J. and Santos, M.B. (1999) Assessment of errors in cetacean diet analysis: in vitro digestion of otoliths. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (79): 573-575.
Yamasaki, F., Takahashi, K. and Kamiya, T. (1974) Digestive tract of la Plata dolphin, Pontoporia blainvillei I. Oesophagus and Stomach. Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica 51(1): 29-51. https://doi.org/10.2535/ofaj1936.51.1_29
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).