Growth layer patterns in <i>Arctocephalus australis</i> canine teeth: evaluation of techniques for age determination
AbstractA total of 75 canine teeth from 27 A. australis (13 males and 14 females) were examined. The animals were found dead from 1977 to 1997 on the coast of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Growth Layer Groups (GLGs) in each canine were compared and examined for age determination using four techniques. These four techniques were evaluated according to the visible number of GLGs in dentine and cementum (techniques 2, 3 and 4) or external rings (technique 1). Technique 4 (decalcified and stained thin section) was the best technique for age determination in A. australis, as it showed the highest conspicuousness of the growth layers (GLGs and accessory layers) in dentine and cementum (especially in old exemplars with pulp cavity closed). Technique 3 (half-tooth etched in 5% formic acid and rubbed with graphite powder) was selected as second best, and recommended for use in dentine counts up to 10 GLGs in males and 6 GLGs in females. Technique 1 (external rings on canine root) offered easy readings until approximately the seventh ring, beyond which misreadings in age determination occurred. Technique 2 (thick unstained and undecalcified sections) presented limitations for obtaining sections of the same thickness compromising a good reading of the GLGs. This in turn could influence the resolution of the growth layers, as the GLGs reading in dentine and cementum were more difficult in this technique than in technique 4.
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).